February 13, 2008 - The S&A Digest: Not Enough Wheat - Agriculture Is Soaring
February 13, 2008 Home | Print Edition | Close Window

Editor's note: As many subscribers know, we regularly publish a note written by the "chairman" of General Motors for our subscribers. He writes a private note to our readers each quarter, following the official press release of GM's earnings (er, continuing losses). We're sure you're grateful for the brutal honesty and a chance to see what's really going on at GM. Your regular Digest will resume tomorrow.

Another Letter from the Chairman of General Motors

Dear shareholders,

It's disco time again. And I'm the dancing fool.

At the end of each quarter, when I must discuss our results with Wall Street, I feel like a doped-up baseball pitcher. Every word that comes out of my mouth and into our press releases is no different than a steroid-fueled fastball: It's all dressed up and completely phony. But it's awfully hard to pin down.

(That's why the press release summary of our earnings came to 47 pages this quarter. And wait until we publish the entire quarterly with the SEC! Give us enough pages of data, and we can make it nearly impossible to figure out the real, core numbers in our business.)

Read the headline of our February 12 annual earnings press release one more time. Have you ever seen more mysterious qualifications? I love it! Almost every line must be "adjusted." Every forward-looking statement is qualified. And we have nothing – absolutely nothing – to say about when, or if, we will ever regain profitability. In fact, our crafty PR people can spend all day writing and not really tell you anything at all. They're brilliant, aren't they?

2007 adjusted net loss of $23 million, reported net loss of $38.7 billion.

2007 adjusted automotive operating pre-tax income improved by almost $900 million.

Strong emerging market performance helps drive record automotive revenue of $178 billion.

Adjusted automotive operating cash flow improvement of $2 billion
Continued improvement in automotive earnings expected for 2008.

How are we really doing? Well, as I've been telling Porter Stansberry for years, we're on the Acela train to bankruptcy. I'll update you on the real facts below.

Nevertheless, I continue to spew in public whatever nonsense our PR flacks tell me to say. But this month, it was hard to say it with a straight face. "We're pleased with the positive improvement trend in our automotive results..."

What a bunch of bullsh*t.

Pardon my French. But if your job were to blow this kind of smoke up investors' butts year after year, pretty soon you'd forget your manners, too. It's truly hard to believe that anyone believes this nonsense...

We suffered the largest annual loss of an automaker EVER last year – $38.7 billion. And nothing about it was pleasant.

Keep in mind, the largest corporate bankruptcy ever – Enron – produced total losses (equity and debt) of about $60 billion. So, we've managed to lose more than half of the Enron total in only one year.

(Some folks who think they know something about accounting will tell you most of this loss was "non-cash" and thus, isn't real. Don't listen to them. If I hadn't refused to merge with Nissan or another profitable car company, we would have had more than $35 billion in tax-loss carry forwards to use, which would have prevented us from paying corporate income taxes for a long, long time. Believe me, those tax-related assets were part of our crown jewels. And now? They're gone, mostly because I wanted to keep my job. That's the real story.)

Here are the real facts.

Nothing in our business has changed. We're still losing money on every car and truck we sell. But we're getting a lot more creative about how we dress up this pig.

For example, the value of the dollar is plummeting. That makes it easier for us to sell cars and trucks in places like Latin America, where for the first time in a generation even the printing press receipts of the banana republics are worth more than our greenback. So, we trumpet and crow that our "automotive" operations on an "adjusted" basis produced record-breaking revenue totals and "operating cash flow" improvements of $2 billion.

While this is technically true – we did bring in more dollars last year selling cars – we don't mention the other side of the ledger, our costs. A weaker dollar means it costs us a lot more money to buy the raw materials we need to make the cars.

Thus, while the nominal amount of our sales went up, the profit margin of those same sales plummeted to negative 3.2%. Told in a much more honest way, last year the weak dollar made it easier for foreigners to buy our cars, which is why sales went up. Unfortunately, the government printing more dollars doesn't change the real economics of our business. The corresponding effect is higher raw materials costs. And thus, our losses grew. (A quick look at our income statement tells you all you need to know. Automotive sales did grow, by about $3 billion. But automotive cost of sales grew more, by nearly $5 billion.)

As I've been warning you privately for months and months, there's simply no way to cram the expenses and obligations we've assumed over the last 40 years on top of the business we have today. It's like we're trying to tow the Titanic into port with a rowboat. And the Titanic is sinking and pulling our shareholders straight to the bottom along with her.

You must understand: Our cost structures and fixed overhead were designed to support an automaker with 30% of the world's car and truck business. But our market share continues to fall every quarter, relentlessly. In the fourth quarter of last year, we hit 13.1% – a new low. Unless we're able to significantly reverse these declines, we can't do anything to save our shareholders.

Here are the things I ought to tell our shareholders.

Given our debt load and our utter inability to grow our market share, it will be impossible for us to avoid bankruptcy. This is the only thing that truly matters to the fate of our shareholders – which is why we never mention it in our press releases and why the mainstream press never brings it up. (More about the obtuse nature of the press in a minute...)

We owe our bondholders more than $33 billion. The interest expense of these debts continues to increase as our credit worthiness continues to decline. This is our death spiral.

We don't make it easy for analysts to see what we're paying in interest. We break down the debts of our various subsidiaries into different categories and list the interest expense in a half dozen different places in our 50 page "summaries." Good luck trying to sort it all out, suckers. But... I can tell you this: Our interest expense in our automotive group alone increased from $2.5 billion in 2005 to more than $2.9 billion in 2007. And that's far more than we can afford, as we're not even making money selling cars anymore. This slow and steady increase to our interest expense is what will eventually drive us out of business. Our interest costs will grow much faster than our nonexistent profits.

These obligations and our rising cost of capital are our real problems, beyond our inability to sell cars at a profit.

And... if our bondholders don't kill us, our employees will. We owe our retired employees health care benefits estimated to be worth $47 billion and pensions worth another $11 billion. Yes, we're trying to work through these obligations by cutting a deal with the union, but the union isn't going to let us out of $60 billion worth of compensation easily.

A few investors are hanging on to the myth that our emerging-markets business in China and Latin America will save us. While these are good businesses, competition in these markets will heat up over time, eroding our margins. And it's extremely unlikely these markets will be big enough in time to save us. Consider: We lost more than twice as much money on our North American operations last year as we made in Latin America. And our profits in China were roughly the same size as our losses in Europe.

Whether we like it or not... our global share of the car market continues to decline.

And so, dear shareholders, you only need to pay attention to those two numbers. As long as our market share continues to fall and our debt service costs continue to climb, we will go bankrupt. There's no doubt about it. When? That's hard to say. We could do a lot of things to postpone the day of reckoning, including mortgaging the rights to our brand names, like Ford has done. Right now, my best guess is that we will file for bankruptcy sometime within the next two years.

Regretfully,

Your Chairman

P.S. I get asked this a lot: If the facts are so clear-cut and easy to see, why doesn't anyone in the mainstream press talk about how dire our situation really is? That's easy. Do you have any idea how much advertising we buy? Not a single TV network or newspaper publisher in America can afford to say anything about us we don't approve.

P.P.S. At least we've got Fritz. If you're going to go broke, you want to have a CFO as strange and stupid as the one we've got. With that ridiculous dead squirrel he's got on his face, he's the perfect fall guy for me. Everyone hates him!

Stansberry & Associates Top 10 Open Recommendations

Stock
Sym
Buy Date
Total Return
Pub
Editor
Seabridge
SA
7/6/2005
842.0%
Sjug Conf.
Sjuggerud
Icahn Enterprises
IEP
6/10/2004
460.9%
Extreme Val
Ferris
Humboldt Wedag
KHD
8/9/2007
311.8%
Extreme Val
Ferris
Exelon
EXC
10/2/2006
299.6%
PSIA
Stansberry
EnCana
ECA
10/1/2002
251.9%
Extreme Val
Ferris
Posco
PKX
4/8/2005
172.2%
Extreme Val
Ferris
Nokia
NOK
7/1/2004
164.0%
PSIA
Stansberry
Petrobras
PBR
2/13/2007
147.4%
Oil Report
Badiali 
Alex & Baldwin
ALEX
10/11/2002
147.1%
Extreme Val
Ferris
Raytheon
RTN
11/8/2002
145.7%
PSIA
Stansberry

Top 10 Totals
5
Extreme Value Ferris
3
PSIA Stansberry
1
Sjug. Conf. Sjuggerud
1
Oil Report Badiali 

Stansberry & Associates Hall of Fame

Stock
Sym
Holding Period
Gain
Pub
Editor
JDS Uniphase
JDSU
1 year, 266 days
592%
PSIA Stansberry
Medis Tech
MDTL
4 years, 110 days
333%
Diligence Ferris
ID Biomedical
IDBE
5 years, 38 days
331%
Diligence Lashmet
Texas Instr.
TXN
270 days
301%
PSIA Stansberry
Cree Inc.
CREE
206 days
271%
PSIA Stansberry
Celgene
CELG
2 years, 113 days
233%
PSIA Stansberry
Nuance Comm.
NUAN
326 days
229%
Diligence Lashmet
Airspan Networks
AIRN
3 years, 241 days
227%
Diligence Stansberry
ID Biomedical
IDBE
357 days
215%
PSIA Stansberry
Elan
ELN
331 days
207%
PSIA Stansberry
 
 

Published by Stansberry & Associates Investment Research
1217 St. Paul Street, Baltimore, MD 21202 888-261-2693


Stansberry & Associates Investment Research is committed to providing our readers with the very best in independent financial analysis. Our subscribers are our highest priority and we welcome any comments or suggestions that you might have. Please e-mail us your feedback: feedback@stansberryresearch.com This link is for editorial feedback only. It is not for customer service.

For customer service questions, please use the following email address: info@stansberrycustomerservice.com. We look forward to your feedback and questions however, the law prohibits us from giving individual and personal investment advice. We are unable to respond to emails and phone calls requesting that type of information.


Copyright 2010 Stansberry & Associates Investment Research. All Rights Reserved. Protected by copyright laws of the United States and international treaties. This newsletter, e-letter, or promotional material may only be used pursuant to the subscription agreement and any reproduction, copying, or redistribution (electronic or otherwise, including on the world wide web) , in whole or in part, is strictly prohibited without the express written permission of Stansberry & Associates Investment Research, LLC. 1217 Saint Paul Street, Baltimore MD 21202.

Any brokers mentioned herein constitute a partial list of available brokers and is for your information only. S&A does not recommend or endorse any brokers, dealers, or investment advisors.

LEGAL DISCLAIMER: This work is based on SEC filings, current events, interviews, corporate press releases, and what we've learned as financial journalists. It may contain errors and you shouldn't make any investment decision based solely on what you read here. It's your money and your responsibility. Stansberry & Associates Investment Research expressly forbids its writers from having a financial interest in any security they recommend to our subscribers. And all Stansberry & Associates Investment Research (and affiliated companies), employees, and agents must wait 24 hours after an initial trade recommendation is published on the Internet, or 72 hours after a direct mail publication is sent, before acting on that recommendation.